17 October 2012: Women in Afghanistan are struggling to have their voices heard in the country's peace process. Mariam Safi, Insight on Conflict's local correspondent for Afghanistan, argues that increasing women's representation must become a top priority.

The absence of a grassroots support network is one of the key reasons women have been unable to exert more influence in the peace process.
Two years after President Hamid Karzai’s consultative Peace Jirga and creation of the Afghanistan Peace and Reintegration Programme, the peace process continues to receive criticism for the ambiguity that surrounds the role of women. Civil society organizations and women’s rights advocates argue that a peace settlement without safeguards to promote and entrench women’s voices could threaten women’s constitutional rights.

Persistent discrimination has prohibited women from garnering a greater role in the design and implementation of the peace process. The Programme’s gender policy, introduced in September 2011, seeks to ensure women’s participation in decision-making at the strategic/political level through the High Peace Council (reconciliation) and at the operational level through gender-mainstreaming in local peace processes (reintegration). However, this policy has been largely ineffective.

Much work remains

The High Peace Council is tasked with leading peace and reconciliation efforts with anti-government elements, but only nine of the 70 members are women. Female members face strict travel bans. They are sidelined from the negotiation process and limited primarily to social outreach activities. According to Council member Najia Ziwari, “much work remains for society to accept and create the necessary space to engage women’s participation in the peace process.”

Women are engaged in local efforts to reintegrate insurgents through the Programme’s sub-national partners, including the Provincial Peace Committees. But women’s participation is limited by high levels of illiteracy, particularly in rural areas. Male committee members, the Ulema [legal scholars], and tribal elders show little or no support for female members. In some provinces, female committee members are restricted from traveling, participating in tribal meetings, and getting involved in the reintegration and demobilization processes.

Innovative contributions

Despite many obstacles, women have managed to contribute in innovative ways to the peace process. Female High Peace Council members are working with local nongovernmental organizations to facilitate the peace process. They engage in discreet dialogue, or “silent advocacy,” with women in insurgent households to encourage their support for the Afghanistan Peace and Reintegration Programme.

In the restive province of Kandahar, female Provincial Peace Committee members successfully organized the first-ever International Women’s Day event on March 8, 2012, with help from a local nongovernmental organization. Committee members have effectively engaged with female relatives of reintegrated personnel to offer them support. In rare cases, they have used their influence within their tribes to negotiate with insurgents.

The absence of a women’s grassroots support network or social movement is one of the key reasons women have been unable to exert more influence in the peace process. Major urban areas like Kabul, Mazar-e-Sharif, or Herat have only in the last decade developed a relatively effective network of women’s issue-based groups. Other provinces have not been as fortunate. Rural Afghanistan has been historically conservative, and, in the current security climate, it is at times inaccessible. As a result women’s movements have not been able to take root in remote areas, although a small community of women’s organizations has slowly started to grow.

A top priority

Inspiring a women’s movement lodged in a strong support network of influential female personalities, government officials, informal justice providers and members of civil society organizations outside the major urban areas must become a priority. Top-down approaches such as the implementation of gender policy will struggle to succeed if a bottom-up approach is not simultaneously pursued.

The Afghanistan Peace and Reintegration Programme and female council members at provincial and national levels should focus on creating a support network of women in the provinces. Such a network could draw from village-level councils, assemblies, the Directorate of the Ministry of Women’s Affairs, and women’s civil society organizations. This approach will enable female members to utilize local women contacts to spread the message of peace in otherwise inaccessible villages and districts.

The engagement of female Provincial Council members, civil society organizations, and other officials will help build awareness of the Afghanistan Peace and Reconciliation Programme at the provincial level. Creating a mechanism at the grassroots level that increases women’s participation and voice in the peace process will draw support among a crucial part of the population of Afghanistan that currently feels vastly isolated.

This article was originally published on the Kroc Institute's Peace Policy blog.


More from the blog

The political lens is zooming in on Sierra Leone as the country is poised to hold its next presidential and parliamentary elections scheduled for March 2018. Read more »

15 November 2017

Eleven years of civil war and the Ebola disease has made many in Sierra Leone sensitive to issues that could renew conflict, particularly conflict along religious lines. A recent clash between Christian and Muslim religious leaders has caused concerns further violence could erupt. But when does crackdown on potential violence infringe upon religious freedoms? And what role should civil society play in mediating these tensions? Read more »

27 November 2017

It has been over a year since a peace agreement was signed between the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the Colombian government. What is the status report on its implementation? A newly released report from the Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies may provide the answer. Read more »

07 December 2017

More from the blog