21 May 2014: Kirthi Jayakumar looks the development of Sharia law in Nigeria and argues that it has been at the root of the emergence of religious conflict in the country.

Image credit: Kipp Jones Image credit: Kipp Jones

Think of Northern Nigeria and for most people the name Boko Haram comes up. The hub of an Islamist insurgency, Northern Nigeria has been in a state of conflict since 2001, culminating with the formation of the Boko Haram. Over the past five years, starting in 2009, the conflict has clearly been at its most violent phase.

Northern Nigeria houses a narrow majority of the country’s Muslim population, most of whom are Sunnis. With their majority, the Muslim population has sought the introduction of Sharia Law, or Islamic Law, as the foundation of all legislation in the region. In the process, as many as twelve of the states in Northern Nigeria have relied on Sharia Law as the basis of their legislative, executive and judicial arrangements since 1999.

The diversity in Nigerian society has often posed a governance challenge, particularly in the context of religion – one of the “most important features of identity”. Sharia Law is technically law that is based on the Qur’an. The issue came to fore because Christians, by their religious affiliation, are exempted from the ambit of Sharia Law, but there remains a lot of tension particularly in those states in Nigeria where Sharia law applies, where many Christians live.

In the 1950s, Sharia Law made its first appearance in the Nigerian legal code. While in 1986, Nigeria was headed by a Muslim military leader and became a member of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, the Christians felt alienated. In 1992, the restoration of full diplomatic relations between Nigeria and Israel turned out to be a move that greatly angered many Muslims. And it was following the 1999/2000 adoption of Sharia law by twelve states in Northern Nigeria that led to the beginnings of the Islamist insurgency.

Following that, there were riots between Christians and Muslims in the city of Jos, after a Muslim Politician, Alhaji Mukhtar Mohammad, was appointed to the local coordinator federal programme to fight poverty. The simmering tensions between the Christian and Muslim population stemmed from the competing claims between both religious groups over the fertile farmlands in central Nigeria’s Plateau State. The flare up culminated in the 2001 Jos riots, where the first large scale face-off between the Christians and the Muslims left about a thousand people dead.

In the next year, the Kaduna riots of November 2002 unfolded after Nigeria’s hosting of the Miss World contest. The tensions continued to thrive with riots manifesting in different parts of the country. In 2004, the infamous Yelwa Massacre occurred, where clashes between Christians and Muslims led to the killing of over 700 people, and the atrocities committed included everything from rape to torture.

Following this, in 2008, a massive slew of riots in Jos over the results of a local election ensured. The winners of the election were not listed publicly, leading to much conjecture and rumours to the effect that the victor was the candidate supported by the Christians. Muslim community members began protesting the election even before the results were announced, and this culminated in two days of rioting. In 2010, the riots went out of hand all the way from January until March, as Christians and Muslims clashed.

In the middle of all this emerged Boko Haram, the infamous insurgent group in Nigeria and designated terrorist group by the US. The group remained peaceful for first seven years of its existence, but the changed in 2009 with the government’s investigation of the group and its activities. With the government taking action against the group, there were deadly clashes, and the group carried out its first act of terror in January 2010. In May 2013, the Nigerian government launched an offensive in the hope of dislodging the Boko Haram. While the offensive was initially successful, Boko Haram gained strength and launched attacks against the government later in August.

While it is certainly true that the insurgency and unrest that has unfolded in Northern Nigeria has been proof of extremism built on religious differences, the simmering undercurrent of conflict on grounds of religious differences has been present throughout the country.

Although one would be wont to perceive the divisiveness in Nigeria as a product of religious tensions, the origins of the conflict lie in ethnicity and economic issues. More recently, these conflicts have had an overlap of sorts with the religious elements – culminating in an unrelenting spate of violence that continues unabated. Therefore, it is fair to say that religion is not the entire cause of the conflict. With a thriving oil industry that earns 95% of all of Nigeria’s foreign exchange earnings and the abject lack of equitable economic development, there was enough of a destabilising factor already in place. However, the catalyst that led to the explosion of the conflict was the issue of Sharia Law.


Eze Eluchie on May 23, 2014, 6:13 a.m.

<p>Good effort at tracing some of the underlining factors of the rise of Islamist terrorism in northern Nigeria. The enthronement, during the regime of Olusegun Obasanjo as President of Nigeria, of Shari'a as State law in a country where the Constitution clearly states that there will be no State Religion has served to fuel the rise of Islamic fundamentalists.  I will however want to point out a seemingly innocuous but vital flaw here - There is a marked difference between the assertion in the article of 'riots between Christians and Muslims' and the reality that a particular sect, fundamental Islamists, ever ready to assert that other religious groups are 'unbelievers deserving of death', are ever willing to unleash violence and mayhem on others they perceive as 'infidels'.  </p> <p></p> <p>Asserting that social issues fueled the rise of Islamist terrorism in Nigeria may also muddle up the reality that the spread of Islamist terrorism from the Middle East, exacerbated by the fall of totalitarian regimes in North Africa (which had hitherto served as buffer for West African countries from the Islamist terror in the Middle East) are the direct causes of the Islamic insurgency we are witnessing not only in Nigeria, but also in Mali and very soon across the West African sub-region.</p>

Dauda Yakubu on May 26, 2014, 9:06 p.m.

In conflict, the under lying sense is interest. The conflict of dominance and continue subjugation of the ''infidel' (minority christians which in reality are the majority and the pillar of peace builders in Nigeria project)by the feudal class who for long have political advantage seem threatened by the the northern oligarchy,who have so much manipulated the political system for their personal interest in exclusion of the talakawas whom they always ''claim'' they represent.Infact, the easiest way to gain sympathy for already bred almajiri system is to use religion colouration for political relevance and control. The change in political equation is seen as a threat for a system which have actually bred laziness and corruption in the northern states from lopsided created local government council which solely depend on federal allocations derived from oil revenue in the south. These army idle almajiri metamorphosed to boko haram with international backing as rightly pointed out. Collective political will is required to address this menace for the future of Nigeria. Peace building through stakeholders engagements, grassroot direct funding and direct participation by NGOs in the affected states is recommended

Clement ubiginomoh on June 2, 2014, 8:56 p.m.

The fundamental issue here is not the question of religious differences but the fanaticism of a sect.Evidence from recent killings shows that it is a religious issue but that does not deny other underground issues of religious tension which has been suppressed. The emergence of boko haram is a culmination of the wide gap of insensitive of government to the plight of the poor.The has a string to economic,political and religious gap created by greed,avarice and self interest of the so called in power. Let's not forget that as we have boko haram in the north so do we have other terrible ,atrocious and destructive groups all over the nation.we are taking of boko haram now but very soon other group will emerged from non where.The escalated war of boko haram was partly due to the negligence of the insensitive government.However,the way forward should be having a government in place that will have the interest and care of the common masses at heart.A government will to be led by the needs,desire and quest of the people.There can be no true peace without justice and there can be no justice without a fair sharing of the natural resources due to the people.From the federal level to the local level the gross level of unabated mammoth corruption must be checked not with lips service but with great political will that will emancipate the masses from the shackles of slavery of what is called government in Nigeria.For me,this should be the first step although for a long term gain.

kabir on Feb. 11, 2015, 9:04 p.m.

Issue of insurgency in africa as whole is not only religions factors mostly is political violence due to to corruption and bad leaders

More from the blog

A poisonous attitude has emerged among the media reporting on the refugee crisis in Lebanon, says Sawssan Abou-Zahr. Bias and racism are being used to blame domestic problems on those fleeing war – and distracting from the real issues. Read more »

29 August 2017

Rwanda has a large migrant and diaspora community and divisions among these groups must be included in the reconciliation process and the journey towards peace, says Jean De Dieu. Read more »

04 August 2017

Discrimination against non-Arabs in Sudan is a major problem, says Quscondy Abdulshafi – and the conflict won’t end until the persecution stops. Read more »

10 August 2017

More from the blog